Continued: US Bank Screw-You-Overdraft Protection (Part 2)

On the same day of my bad experience at US Bank, I wrote a letter to the branch manager, Jamie Cox, the 24 hour banking management office, and Richard K. Davis, US Bancorp CEO.

It took a few days, but Andre the assistant branch manager called me with the following "apology":

  • he didn't care for my attitude, which is why he asked me leave his desk
  • everything I said in my letter was not correct
  • he did not appreciate being called unprofessional in my letter because he is a professional
  • the US Bank OBP Code 09 memo was for internal use only
  • still says that in five years he's never had to know about this code
  • I did not accept his apology and I got off the phone as quickly as possible. I didn't mention to him that he failed to reverse my incorrect overdraft fee, only because I knew, based on my latest experience with him, that he had no intention of rectifying his mistakes or behavior.

    To add insult to injury, the branch manager also called to "apologize" that I felt I had a bad experience, and then proceeded to back up Andre's position and actually offered to close my account over the phone, and bordered on insistent when I said I'd take care of at my own convenience.

    Wow.

    But, then I got a letter from the CEO office. The photo of the letter is here, and the text is below:

    Dear Mr. Fortuny:

    Thank you for your letter addressed to Mr. Richard K. Davis, Chairman, President and CEO of U.S. Bancorp. I have been asked to provide you with a response on behalf of Mr. Davis and the other recipients of your correspondence.

    Foremost, please accept our sincere apologies for the service experience provided at U.S. Bank's Kirkland branch office. We are troubled by any instance when a customer feels that our personnel failed to deliver on our commitment to service, and your letter clearly details an experience that was not favorable. Our office has provided a copy of your complaint to Mr. Derek Pender, Bellevue Metro District Manager, and we understand that Jamie Cox has recently been in contact with you about this matter.

    U.S. Bank makes every effort to ensure that our employees have the tools and support necessary to promptly and accurately address the questions and concerns our customers may pose, and we regret that your visit to the branch did not leave a more favorable impression of our products and services.

    As you may already be aware, U.S. Bank has honored your request to opt out of our general overdraft limits for your account, and this designation will remain in effect unless you inform us otherwise. However, we request that you immediately return the original copy of our internal procedure for this service. Please return this document to my attention at our letterhead address. The documentation for U.S. Bank's policies and procedures is proprietary information, and you are hereby notified to not copy or disseminate this procedure.

    We appreciate that you took the time to share your concerns, and look forward to the opportunity to better meet your expectation in your future.

    Sincerely,
    William Williamson
    Executive Communications
    for Richard K. Davis
    Chairman, President and CEO
    U.S. Bancorp


    cc: Derek Pender, Bellevue Metro District Manager, Jamie Cox, Branch Manager, Kirkland Office

    Frankly, I like the apology. It's to the point and it comes from the CEO's office. I do not like this demand to return the OBP procedure document. Hmm. Just how do I inform Mr. Williamson that his precious super secret document is already all over the internet and I intend on making it even more all over the internet just because of his demand?

    That's it for this chapter, but I suspect it's not over.

    As for the overdraft protection, it took two weeks, but I finally got a confirmation letter confirming that courtesy overdraft protection is removed from my account. Fantastic.

    Oh, btw, if you want to write a letter to US Bancorp CEO Richard K. Davis, here's the address that actually got me a response:

    US Bancorp, The Office of the Corp. Secretary
    Richard K. David, Chairman, President & CEO
    800 Nicollet Mall
    Minneapolis, MN. 55402

    Related Links

  • USBank Screw-You-Overdraft Protection Part 3
  • USBank Screw-You-Overdraft Protection (Part 1)
  • [ banking, threats published on 2008-02-06 | Comments (1) | Permalink (3,436) ]

    US Bank Screw-You-Overdraft Protection (Part 1)

    Ever been charged an overdraft fee by your bank? Sucks for you and me, but banks love it. Overdraft fees accounted for US$50 billion in bank revenue in 2007. As a temporary loan, they can mean as much as 2,000% interest for the bank.

    Ever wanted to turn off overdraft protection? US Bank is doing everything they can to make sure you don't find out how:

    Turns out that Federal banking regulations require banks to allow customers to opt out of so-called "courtesy" overdraft protection systems. When you opt out, any charges that can't be covered by your current available balance will be declined.

    Here's how it works when you turn off overdraft protection: if you have $500 in the bank, you clear a $490 check, and then you try to make a $30 purchase with your debit card, the charge will be declined. In this instance you won't have a pesky $28-$35 overdraft fee per overdrawn item, plus a $7-$10/day negative balance fee.

    However, this opt-out does not save your ass if, for example, you do pay-at-the-pump authorizations, where they only ping your card for a dollar and let you go on your way with a full tank of gas, and the final charge overdrafts you. In this case, you still pay a fee. This also happens when you go out to dinner and your final total doesn't clear until the tip is factored in. To avoid this, always pay at the gas counter with a set amount instead of at the pump, and always tip your server in cash.

    How to opt-out of courtesy overdraft

    Every bank has a different term and system, but the rules are generally the same:

  • banks will never offer you this opt-out. You must specifically know how to request it. (U.S. Bank internally calls it's courtesy overdraft protection opt out OBP Code 09.)
  • you must opt out at your local branch. If telephone customer service offers to do it, they're doing it wrong.
  • most banks will try to talk you out of it. Don't let them.
  • once you opt-out, you should receive a letter in the mail either confirming the action or requiring your signature and return. Follow the instructions promptly. Your opt out won't take effect until your paperwork has been processed.
  • Don't backup your account with a credit card or savings account

    This is scam #2 in the banking universe. While bankers will try to convince you to trade in your overdraft protection for credit card protection, it's still a bad idea. US Bank, for example, charges for every overdraft incident where money from a protection source is applied to your account. You may pay as little as $5, but you're still paying for the privilege of US Bank automatically transferring money from one of your accounts to another, a service that's free when you do it yourself online or through the automated phone system, or only $2 when you have a telephone banker do it.

    How I came to know all this: horrible customer service

    Back in December, I called up US Bank about an overdraft fee I had. It was totally my fault, so I didn't ask them to fix it. I just asked if there's anything else I could do to turn off overdraft protection. That must have been the magic word because the telephone banking rep said he could turn off courtesy overdraft protection for me over the phone.

    Of course, when I had an overdraft in January, I was pissed. I called again, got another rep who confirmed the same courtesy overdraft protection but said I had to go to my local branch to do it. So I went to my branch on January 11.

    I waited 10 minutes in the bank lobby while Andre Branch, the football player sized assistant manager, chatted for 10 minutes on the phone with someone about non-business stuff. When he was finally ready to see me, I retold him my story and said I wanted to cancel my courtesy overdraft protection. He looked at me confused and said he didn't understand. I tried to explain it to him for several more minutes.

    Finally, he said, "let me talk to my people." He picked up the phone, dialed a number and said, "do you know what this guy is talking about?" as he looked across the room. I looked, too, and he had dialed one of the tellers to ask her! She didn't know, either, so he suggested that what I was asking for didn't exist. I suggested that maybe he should do a little more research.

    He called his district office while I called telephone banking again. I confirmed for a third time that you can opt out of courtesy overdraft protection. Once the manager heard me confirm it, he piped in that he knew it now and it was called "OBP code" (thus leading to my research above -- thanks Consumerist, the world's best consumer advocate website!).

    He hassled me if I really wanted to do this, emphasized that the change was permanent, and I confirmed. While he was putting codes into the computer, he made the off-hand comment, "I'm not surprised nobody else knew about this. It's a very obscure feature."

    To which I replied, "three telephone bankers knew about this feature. You're an assistant branch manager. You really should know. There's no excuse," and glared at him.

    Then he got pissy: "look, I've been nothing but nice to you and I've done everything you've asked, and now you're being a smart ass." "Excuse me?" "You heard me. You brought it, now I'm bringin' it. You can go sit in the lobby." "I'm not done, no thank you." "You can go sit in the lobby."

    (Please note that I had asked him to reverse my latest overdraft fee as a courtesy for this mix-up. It has not been reversed.)

    At which point I went home and wrote a complaint letter to the branch manager, the central banking management office and the CEO. The branch letter was delivered the next Monday. In the letter, I detailed the incident, and included a copy of the US Bank internal memo about OBP Code 09 that was dated August 2007 as evidence that the assistant branch manager should have known about the feature, or knew about it and tried to deceive me, which either makes him incompetent or a liar.

    You can see the response I got here.

    (Last note: I try to keep my banking balance at zero because I transfer all my money into my PayPal Mastercard debit card, which gives me 5.2% APY on my balance and pays 1% cash back immediately for every credit purchase. It also doesn't charge overdraft fees or negative balance fees. The only time I have money in my US Bank account is when I need to pay rent. However, once in a while an organization will have my old card on file and I'll forget that detail. I'd rather be notified that an old charge somewhere was declined rather than incur more dastardly overdraft fees.)

    Related Links

  • Continued: US Bank Screw-You-Overdraft Protection (Part 2)
  • USBank Screw-You-Overdraft Protection Part 3
  • [ banking published on 2008-02-06 | Comments (7) | Permalink (1,685) ]

    Flash Player Slow Performance 9.0.115

    If you've recently upgraded your version of flash and noticed that flash video now performs horribly, you're not alone.

    Flash 9.0.115 contains a cross-platform code update called "Moviestar" that appears to have broken hardware acceleration, or crippled it badly. Downgrading is a pain. So, I've prepared a downgrade installer for Windows:

    You can view your current version of flash at Adobe's self service site.

    Download rfjason's flash installer for Windows IE/FF/Op

    flash_win_9_0_47.exe (2.41mb)

    This package runs through Adobe's uninstall utility, manually removes registry entries, then installs the plug-in/activex packages for Firefox and IE. I hear this works on Opera, too.

    If you can't use this installer, you're welcome to manually downgrade at Adobe's archive.

    So what happened? The latest version of flash supports the new x-embed standard, h.264, aac and fullscreen video acceleration. The current argument rages whether Adobe broke hardware acceleration, or whether the x-embed code does something stupid like tons of memcopys. Either way, the latest version sucks.

    Related Links

  • Adobe Blog: Flash Player 9 Update 3 Final
  • Adobe Support Files Archive
  • Adobe's self service site
  • [ tech published on 2008-02-04 | Comments (6) | Permalink (2,344) ]

    LJopoly

    Please don't sue me Parker Bros. or Six Apart. I've just always wanted to do this. LJopoly was begging to be made. So here it is:

    LJopoly playing board. Click for large 1350x1350 PNG version.

    Lulz & FTW Cards

    You Have Been Elected LJ President. Pay Each Player $50. Go Directly To LJ Abuse. Do Not Post To LJ. Do Not Collect $200.

    Bank Notes

    user info Jameth LJopoly bank money

    Download Printable PDFs

  • LJopoly Board 18.75" x 18.75" (508k PDF)
  • LJopoly Board for 8.5" x 11" printers. (3.84mb PDF)
  • Six sheet assemble to 18.75" x 18.75" board 16 lulz cards, 16 ftw cards (253k PDF)
  • 28 user info cards (44.3k PDF)
  • 7 sheets of money (94k PDF)
  • Each PDF is designed for printing on standard 8.5"x11" color printers. For the money, ordinary copy paper will work. For the board and cards, I recommend using heavy stock paper for about $11 online, or $15 at your local office supply store. You'll also need to cut everything yourself. See related links for shopping options.

    Related Links

  • xerox 60lb 98 brightness at Amazon.com
  • X-Acto Paper Trimmer at Amazon.com
  • [ opoly published on 2007-08-05 | Comments (1) | Permalink (2,522) ]

    Boldly Going To Nerdville

    So, just how big is the NCC-1701-D USS Enterprise from Star Trek: The Next Generation?

    Here is an overlay of the Enterprise on the Seattle Center. At 643 meters in length, notice how it dwarfs the Space Needle, EMP, Key Arena, Childrens Museum, and IMAX. See also: In relation to the University of Washington, and in relation to Qwest Field and Safeco Field. The saucer section is 467 meters wide, which is 510 yards, or about five football fields.

    Here's what the Seattle sky line would look like if the Enterprise were to fly over it. As you can see, the Enterprise is just about 7 city blocks long, and taller than a 40 story building.

    Over the Pentagon. I tried to center the bridge over Ground Zero Cafe. Let's see if that freaks the Russians out some more. (Only Pentagon know-it-alls will get that joke.)

    The Ellipse at The White House. The Ellipse circumference is about the same as the dorsal phaser array. The White House occupies about the same area as the rear shield grid.

    The Colosseum in Rome. There's really no comparison here. The Colosseum doesn't even occupy the same space as the top six decks. Those of you who have seen the Colosseum (me!) are getting a sense of just how big the Enterprise-D really is.

    Computer, arch! The St. Louis Arch is 630ft high and 630ft wide at its base. That's 192 meters versus the saucer section's 467 meters. Ignore the skyscrapers in the background which are obviously at a distance from the Arch and do not reflect a comparative size to the Enterprise.

    Over Liberty Island, NY.

    Over and cross sectioned with Manhattan. Even this city's enormity is brought into perspective when you put the entire ship on it. Whoever initially described the Ent-D as a "city in space" wasn't kidding!

    And if Wil Wheaton is reading this, since you were kind enough to link here, it turns out the Enterprise is about the size the of Paramount lot after all.

    (disclaimer: all calculations were done using comparative mapping and data using Google Maps, Ex Astris Scientia, and TNG Trek Core. Accuracy +/- a few pixels.)

    Goodbye, Seattle!

    And last, but not least, my gift to the people of Seattle for last weekend's Memorial Day holiday.

    [ geeknerd, star trek published on 2007-05-30 | Comments (80) | Permalink (82,620) ]

    Verizon FIOS: Good Product, Tax Free!

    I'm keeping FIOS.

    I called Comcast to cancel my internet service yesterday. That one call renewed my hatred for them, all in less than four minutes. The nice rep on the phone allowed me to make changes to my account without verifying my account password, even though it's right there on all the screens. Way to go, Comcast.

    It's bad enough that you've done this to me multiple times. I wonder how many hundreds of thousands of customers similarly entrust their privacy to you, only to have you toss it aside like a used condom?

    Comcast's supervisor policy leaves a little to be desired as well: if you request a supervisor, you're promised a callback within 1 hour or 24 hours, depending on the rep you talk to. Naturally, I've been waiting for a supervisor to call me for 32 hours now.

    Oh, and don't forget that Comcast plans on charging for tech support next month. Way to go, asscakes.

    Anyway.

    I'm keeping FIOS for one simple reason: FIOS doesn't choke like Comcast does.

    Let's say you're downloading a 350mb or 700mb torrent from a few thousand sources. With Comcast, your bandwidth becomes completely useless. Even if you're only downloading at 100kbit/s and uploading at 45kbit/s, you can't browse, check e-mail, ping, or do anything. Comcast cripples you mercilessly. If you have Comcast right now, you know what I'm talking about.

    With FIOS, I can download up to four torrents at 80kbit/s to 300kbit/s, and not even feel it while browsing and checking e-mail. I'll hand it to you, Verizon: this is wonderful. Ping latency during MPD (massively parallel downloading) torrents only goes up slightly to the point it's not even worth reporting.

    So, yes, I still despise the fact that I'm giving money to the unholy seed of bad service Verizon. But, at least I'm getting some pretty decent internet in exchange.

    We Don't Need No Steenking Taxes

    There is one odd point that showed up. My 2nd month bill was precisely $34.95, the rate I'm okay being stuck with. No taxes, no fees, nothing. Are you telling me, Verizon, that you don't have to charge any tax whatsoever on your FIOS? That here, in Washington, the king of high utility and service taxes (we pay 25% taxes on our cell phone bills here, folks) you're getting a free ride? That Erin, the "oh-no-you-dih-int" service rep from Hell was accidentally right? I find that hard to believe. I think it more likely that you've already fucked up your billing procedure and I'll see some sort of insane charge on my card between now and AUGHAOSHGLJHSLKJGDSLJADSLJK.

    Because you're just that retarded.

    Update: Comcast Videos

    Related Links

  • All FIOS Articles
  • Consumerist: Comcast will start charging for tech support
  • TorrentFreak: How To Bypass Comcast Bittorrent Throttling
  • [ fios published on 2007-04-26 | Comments (1) | Permalink (1,742) ]

    What Rumors - Celebrity News and Gossip Wiki WhatRumors.com

    Celebrity News and Gossip Wiki

    Latest Posters

    Create your own inspirational posters >>

    Latest Image Macros

    Create your own image macros >>